I got to thinking as I cycled along somewhat behind the rest of the group that cycling has a knack of bringing to the forefront of one’s consciousness the basic essences of your personality. I am something of a loner; to be honest I’m not sure whether this is by nature or by social conditioning, your guess is as good as mine. I am a person who enjoys his own company, perhaps it is because I was an only child. So my default position, when I need to tackle a challenge or solve a problem, is to hive off on my own and work things out for myself no matter how long it takes. On this trip, I was aware and grateful to be part of a team, but I am not one of those cyclists who wants to have a “deep and meaningful” with my fellow riders as we travel along. In fact, I get quite cross when I see cyclists riding in a bunch across the road and thus impeding everything that wants to overtake them; riding like that is downright selfish and gets cyclists a bad name. We on the team developed a strategy by which the last rider shouted “car” to the next rider up the line and so a warning jumped up to the front rider and we made sure that we kept well into the side of the road. To return to my tendency to keep the “deep and meaningful” as an inner rather than an external conversation – Scott cycled up to me on one occasion and said, “all right, Mick?” The response he got was somewhat similar to that received by a parent who asks their adolescent son what he has been up to on a given day; in other words, an incoherent grunt. To give him his due, Scott recognised my loner tendency and respected it and did not appear to be particularly bothered by what could have been interpreted as downright rudeness on my part.
As we are on the subject of Scott, he reminds me in some ways of the guy I roomed with on the London to Paris ride, a ride which I did in 2014 between the two LEJOG rides. This guy was actually a Scot from Glasgow named William, although everybody called him “Willie”. We met when we were billeted together at a hotel in Kyriad Coquelles, just outside Calais, on the first night of the ride. He was twice my size, amiable and as we were to spend several nights together I felt it might be wise to warn him that I snored horrendously and that I was not capable of climbing onto a top bunk any more. His reply was accepting and charitable; well I think it was as I could only understand one in four words he uttered due to his extremely strong accent and the fact that my hearing is not as good as it used to be. From what I could gather he had no problem with either of these confessions. Willie had a crap bike which looked like it had been cobbled together from bits salvaged from a skip. He was dressed largely in denim and wore on his feet enormous workman’s boots. He was, in other words, the very antithesis of the ideal candidate for a long-distance cycling. However, he managed to haul himself up every climb with ease largely, it appeared to me, by brute strength fuelled with considerable amounts of beer. Now I am not suggesting that our Scott is Willie’s doppelganger but there are certain similarities. Our Scott is a very powerfully built guy and also seems to have the capacity to haul his not inconsiderable bulk up hills and at times he even gave Ollie a run for his money. Although our Scott has a much better bike and had done a lot of training for this ride (it was Willie’s proud boast that he had done none at all for London to Paris) there was a certain similarity in dress sense. We were all attired in gleaming new Lycra, Scott by way of contrast, wore a pair of rather baggy old fashion cycling trousers and a tee shirt which was emblazoned back and front with a full-sized picture of a human skeleton. In terms of communication the main difference between Scott and Scottish Willie was the fact I could understand Scott when he talked to me. Sorry Scott for the somewhat brusque reply you got that day and thanks for understanding me as you did and respecting my antisocial stance on the bike.
Second lunch was taken in the car park of a small village pub which was conveniently shut. This time the link up worked smoothly and thus the pattern for the two weeks riding was successfully established. Lizzie had, at that point, serious doubts about her ability to ride the full distance every day so she decided to drop out after lunch and ride in big Cav to the end of the day’s route. Now, personally I thought that Lizzie would be able to ride the whole distance, what she lacked was nothing to do with physicality, for like her brother Ollie, she was ideally placed to be a natural bike rider; I felt it was rather to do with lack of confidence. I decided however that, at this point in the ride, it would be better to run with her pulling out and let her find her own legs and then if she showed signs of wanting to ride all day, which I thought given a day or two she would, I would then encourage her to have a go. Naturally, this conversation would need to take place whilst I wasn’t riding my bike!